There were secret meetings, there are numerous indications of dirty money, and the CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 22:26, 30 April 2018 (UTC) Can you cite specific "sensational" items in the book? If you think these topics haven't been widely reported, I suggest you read Special Counsel investigation (2017–present) thoroughly. If this claim is important and/or credible, why isn't it widely reported? Fact checker_ at your service 22:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC) Books by their nature can be more detailed than website and newspaper articles, but the other parts raised are good. soibangla ( talk) 21:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC) "Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win" is not a book of sensational claims? What do we make of the fact that the author isn't reserving judgment, like typical facts sources do, but instead tries to persuade the reader that Trump colluded? Biased sources are supposed to be used with caution-if at all. I suggest the edit should remain in the article. The book/edit asserts Russia's interest in Trump dates back to at least 1987, perhaps even 1977, and this buttresses the assertions made in the dossier that Russia had been actively cultivating him for "at least" five years. The author, also cited in four other places in this article, appears serious and reputable, rather than a sensationalist.The book, "Collusion," was a #1 NYT bestseller published by a major publishing house excerpted on a major politics site discussed on nationwide radio and in serious policy magazine.This edit was removed because "Undue, claim published in sensational book, largely ignored in reputable media and it's not even about the dossier"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |